How Starbucks Became the King of Coffee

Starbucks, the coffee shop chain that started with the coffee cups, is the king of coffee, the world’s largest coffee company.

The company sells more than 400 million cups of coffee every day and is expected to double that next year, when it sells an estimated 5.5 billion.

But as the coffee giant has grown, it has also faced growing scrutiny from the public.

As the company has diversified into products like espresso, its stock has become increasingly polarizing, and some of the company’s most ardent critics have accused the company of making millions off of a product that has been a cornerstone of the American economy for more than a century.

That’s what the latest Starbucks earnings report highlights, as the company reported strong sales and earnings growth for the first half of the year.

Starbucks is also the only coffee company in the world to have more than one billion customers.

The CEO of Starbucks, Howard Schultz, is widely regarded as one of the world the world leaders in coffee.

The world’s second largest coffee roaster, he’s also the first black CEO of an American company.

But it’s not just that Starbucks is one of America’s most celebrated brands.

Its coffee has been described as a “sensational drink” and has been hailed as a cultural touchstone, as well as an iconic symbol of the United States.

But its influence has also been challenged by an increasing number of companies that have adopted its products.

And in recent years, the company also has faced criticism for using its global reach to sell its own products.

The coffee chain is also facing a new wave of consumer pressure, spurred by a growing movement against racism and sexism.

A new report by the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies found that more than half of all Americans are either unaware of the racial and gender inequities in the U.S. workplace or think it’s too difficult to address.

Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz has been criticized for using the company as a vehicle to promote his company’s products.

(Photo: Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)”There are too many companies that are selling products from Starbucks as if it’s a product of the past,” said Robert Graham, an ethics professor at Indiana University.

“There is no question that there are problems, and I think the issue is going to continue to be raised.

And it’s going to be a question of, are there problems that can be fixed?”

The company’s latest earnings report did not include revenue from Starbucks’ online stores, which are subject to government regulations.

But Starbucks also has been under pressure from lawmakers, who are trying to curb the company.

They want to make it harder for the company to sell to companies that would not abide by U.K. rules on gender equality.

And a recent Supreme Court decision has forced the company into the middle of a bitter battle over whether it should be able to advertise for sex-segregated bathrooms in schools.

Starbucks has also lost more than $1 billion in stock since the summer, and the company recently announced that it will be closing at least two stores, including its flagship outlet in the Bay Area.

And the company says it will likely close more stores in the future.

But for now, Starbucks is the only major coffee company that can’t be sold in the United Kingdom because it has no legal right to do so.

And that’s a decision that has angered many consumers.

“I’m not a fan of Starbucks and I’m not going to buy a cup of coffee from them,” said one consumer who gave his name as Sam.

“But the company needs to do better.”

The CEO told Reuters last year that Starbucks has become a “gateway” to other brands and that it needs to become a leader in the coffee business.

But in the latest earnings call, Schultz said he’s not looking for a new deal with any other coffee company to help it expand its brand.

He also said that the company would focus on its core business of selling coffee, and that he will continue to focus on his company as the world leader in coffee, even though it has faced accusations of racism.

Schultz has long defended his company and has said it has a mission to help people feel good about being an American.

But some have said that while he’s trying to be inclusive and create a better world, his company is often focused on serving the company, not the people who buy its products or serve in its restaurants.

Starbucks also faces questions over whether the company is doing enough to address issues of racism in the workplace.

A recent report from the Human Rights Campaign found that nearly half of American companies have failed to investigate or remedy allegations of racism at their workplaces, and only a small percentage have gone as far as to create formal policies to address discrimination in the work place.

And just last week, Starbucks announced that a new anti-discrimination policy was being developed.

The policy will address a number of issues that the human rights group has highlighted, including the way that Starbucks treats employees who report discrimination, the